Drawing for TELEVISION STOCK EXCHANGE

USPTO serial 76339399

TELEVISION STOCK EXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELEVISION STOCK EXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M. Eichler

LAUREN J MANDELL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education and entertainment services in the nature of a simulated securities exchange game accessible through a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination a wide range of information; and production and distribution for others of motion picture films, radio programs and television shows relating to a securities exchange gameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 3, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance