USPTO serial 76339680
FOODTRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FOODTRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHARLOTTETOWN, PE, CA
ALBANY, PEI, CA
FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, CA
Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, CA
Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
IN THE PROVINCE OF Prince Edward Island, CA
Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Palisi
Thomas M. Palisi Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP20 Commerce DriveCranford, NJ 07016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FRESH VEGETABLES | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FOOD TRUST 2008 LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MID-ISLE FARMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named FOODTRUST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |