USPTO serial 76339749
PLANET PILLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANET PILLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Castries, Saint Lucia, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W WALLEN III
JOHN W WALLEN III WASHINGTON DC 20006-5209PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP1735 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 500NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online pharmacy and ordering services featuring pills, pharmaceuticals and goods related to supplementing individual health; providing consumer product information in the field of pharmaceuticals, drugs and health supplements | ACTIVE | Jul 9, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |