USPTO serial 76339793
THE S.M.A.R.T. TECHNIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE S.M.A.R.T. TECHNIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin E. Peterka
KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2457UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video and audio cassette tapes and compact discs (CDs), all featuring information relating to hypnosis, self-hypnosis, and hypnotherapy, weight loss, diet, fitness, health, self-improvement, financial improvement, self-empowerment, smoking cessation, overcoming sexual dysfunction, overcoming fears, and relationship improvement | ACTIVE | Apr 12, 2002 |
| 016 | books, pamphlets, magazines, newsletters, and printed materials, all featuring information relating to hypnosis, self-hypnosis, and hypnotherapy, weight loss, diet, fitness, health, self-improvement, financial improvement, self-empowerment, smoking cessation, overcoming sexual dysfunction, overcoming fears, and relationship improvement | ACTIVE | Apr 12, 2002 |
| 035 | providing consumer information on products relating to hypnosis, self-hypnosis, and hypnotherapy, weight loss, diet, fitness, health, self-improvement, financial improvement, self-empowerment, smoking cessation, overcoming sexual dysfunction, overcoming fears, and relationship improvement via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Apr 12, 2002 |
| 044 | providing information in the fields of hypnosis, self-hypnosis, and hypnotherapy, weight loss, diet, health, smoking cessation, overcoming sexual dysfunction and overcoming fears | ACTIVE | Apr 12, 2002 |
| 045 | providing information in the fields of self-improvement, self-empowerment, and relationship improvement | ACTIVE | Apr 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C SQUARED TV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by C SQUARED TV, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named THE S.M.A.R.T. TECHNIQUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |