USPTO serial 76339812
ARRAY CYTOMETRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARRAY CYTOMETRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric P. Mirabel
ERIC P MIRABEL BIOARRAY SOLUTIONS LTD35 TECHNOLOGY DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Preparations for scientific and research use, namely, biological or biotechnical arrays and assemblies of constituents of biological cells, methods, tests, kits consisting of the aforementioned; biological preparations for random encoded array detection to record optical signatures from cells randomly dispersed in a planar array or assembly and optically programmable reconfiguration and segmentation of assemblies cells; a highly parallel assay format that is useful for a wide variety of multiplexed bioanalytical assays, including functional and structural cellular analysis that is enabled by the optically programmable assembly and manipulation of cells (e.g., bacterial, yeast and human) providing quantitative, multi parameter cell surface analysis by direct imagining as well as fractionation and sorting of mixed cell populations | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distribution of services in the field of biological or biotechnical arrays and assemblies of constituents of biological cells, methods, tests, kits, or apparatus therefor; random encoded array detection to record optical signatures from cells randomly dispersed in a planar array or assembly and optically programmable reconfiguration and segmentation of assemblies cells; a highly parallel assay format that is useful for a wide variety of multiplexed bioanalytical assays, including functional and structural cellular analysis that is enabled by the optically programmable assembly and manipulation of cells (e.g., bacterial, yeast and human) providing quantitative, multiparameter cell surface analysis by direct imaging as well as fractionation and sorting of mixed cell populations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |