USPTO serial 76339954
SERVICE CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERVICE CHAIN MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBYN J RAHBAR
ROBYN J RAHBAR SIMPSON THATCHER BARTLETT425 LEXINGTON AVE RM 1500NEW YORK, NY 10017-3954UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Comprehensive professional services automation software solutions designed to improve the process of managing and delivering services, namely, software for improving service delivery and operational efficiency through the integration of a company's software solutions and managing service delivery, resources and skills, requests, projects, engagements and contracts, time and expense, invoicing, places and assets, knowledgebase, customer relationships, staffing, contractors, operations reports, services catalogs, skill/qualifications/certifications, hiring and recruiting workflow | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2001 |
| 035 | retail services in the field of professional services automation software, namely, computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals, computer systems and computer networks | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2001 |
| 042 | computer professional services automation software consultation and integration of professional services automation software designed to improve the process of managing and delivering goods and services, namely, consultation and integration of a company's software solutions and managing service delivery, resources and skills, requests, projects, engagements and contracts, time and expense, invoicing, places and assets, knowledgebase, customer relationships, staffing, contractors, operations reports, services catalogs, skills/qualifications/certifications, hiring and recruiting workflow | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |