Drawing for MIDAS

USPTO serial 76339991

MIDAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIDAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark R. Galis

MARK R GALIS GREENBERG TRAURIG, PCSTE 250077 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1732

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote control units for controlling televisions, video cassette recorders, stereos, cable boxes, satellite dishes, computers, fans, and lightingACTIVEFeb 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2007MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Apr 17, 2007ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Sep 18, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2006CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 13, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 1, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance