USPTO serial 76340048
BONJOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BONJOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy M. Friedberg
Randy M. Friedberg Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenzweig & Wolosky LLP65 Eash 55th StreetNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrance products for personal use, namely, perfume, cologne, toilet water, scented body lotion and moisturizing cream, body oil, body powder, scented soap; cosmetics and skin care preparations, namely, foundation make-up, face powder, blusher, compacts, eye pencils, lip pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, non-medicated lip balm, mascara, eye make-up, eyeliners, skin moisturizer and skin toner; hair care products, namely, shampoo, hair conditioners, hair gel and hair spray; nail care preparations, namely, nail polish, nail strengtheners, and nail polish remover; shaving cream, shaving gel, after-shave lotion; skin soap; shower gel; deodorant; antiperspirant; potpourri; sachets; suntanning preparations; sun screen and sun block preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Eyeglasses, sunglasses, eyeglass cases and eyeglass chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings, cufflinks, ornamental pins, watches, watch straps, pocket watches and clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Backpacks, carry-on bags, book bags, school bags, tote bags, travel bags, billfolds, toiletry cases sold empty; clutch purses, change purses, wallets, handbags, shoulder bags, fanny packs, waist packs, luggage, luggage tags, key cases and umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing, footwear and accessories, namely, coats, raincoats, jackets, leather jackets, parkas, anoraks, scarves, mittens, gloves, hats, caps, visors, earmuffs, pants, jeans, shirts, blouses, sweaters, suits, sport coats, vests, skirts, dresses, jumpers, leggings, tights, socks, stockings, bodysuits, leotards, jumpsuits, warm-up suits, ski wear, sweat shirts, sweat pants, t-shirts, polo shirts, shorts, boxer shorts, briefs, underwear, bras, slips, camisoles, pajamas, night shirts, night gowns, robes, shoes, sneakers, boots, sandals, slippers, belts, ties, suspenders, bathing suits, bathing trunks and beachwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Ornamental novelty buttons, cloth patches for clothing, embroidered emblems, hair ornaments, hair bands, barrettes, hair bows and hair ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bon Jour Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Bon Jour Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named BONJOUR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |