USPTO serial 76340163
ETECHNICIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETECHNICIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sterling Heights, MI
Sterling Heights, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH W. MEDANSKY
KEITH W MEDANSKY PIPER RUDNICKPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, ILLONOIS 60604-0807,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive web-based diagnostic system for analyzing, monitoring and diagnosing vehicle components, systems and operations and for processing vehicle data | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |