USPTO serial 76340176
CHONDROCELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3089021Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHONDROCELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee, Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR BARNES & THORNBURGPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN THE EXPANSION, SELECTION, QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN THE BIOPSY OF HUMAN IN VITRO CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; COVERINGS INCLUDING MEMBRANES FOR USE FOR COVERING IMPLANTS OF HUMAN IN VIVO CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; NUTRACEUTICALS FOR USE IN THE EXPANSION, SELECTION, QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR USE FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE CONTROL OF EXPANSION, SELECTION AND IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; HORMONES FOR THE PROMOTION OF THE GROWTH OF CELLS, NAMELY, HUMAN GROWTH HORMONES AND GROWTH AND DIFFERENTIATION PROMOTING POLYPEPTIDES FOR MEDICAL USE; CELLS, NAMELY HUMAN IN VIVO CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS, FOR MEDICAL OR CLINICAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL GUIDEWIRES, NAMELY STITCHING MATERIAL, SURGICAL GLUES AND COVERINGS INCLUDING MEMBRANES FOR USE IN THE IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; APPARATUS, NAMELY DNA CHIPS, FOR USE IN MEDICAL ANALYSIS FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HUMAN IN VIVO CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | PHARMACEUTICAL ADVICE IN THE FIELD OF EXPANSION, SELECTION, QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; CONDUCTING OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES IN THE EXPANSION, SELECTION, QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE EXPANSION, SELECTION, QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; QUALITY CONTROL FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN IN VIVO, CARTILAGE FORMING CELLS; MEDICAL EVALUATION SERVICES, NAMELY, FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING MEDICAL REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF GUIDING TREATMENT AND ASSESSING PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigenix N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigenix N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigenix N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHONDROCELECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |