Drawing for XANODYNE PHARMACAL

USPTO serial 76340242

XANODYNE PHARMACAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XANODYNE PHARMACAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kurt A. Summe

KURT A SUMME WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005line of pharmaceuticals for consumption and use by humans, namely, oncology, hematology, pain management and stimulant pharmaceuticals and compositionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 24, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 10, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance