USPTO serial 76340290
LASER NEUROTHERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2003
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LASER NEUROTHERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. F. Gallinger
G. F. Gallinger Premier Patent7420 Milner Dr.Colorado Springs, CO 80920UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | medical services in the nature of providing laser therapy to treat injured or pathological tissue | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Radebaugh, Thomas R.
- Other trademarks owned by Radebaugh, Thomas R.
- Other trademarks owned by Riggs, Jeffrey M.
- Other trademarks owned by Riggs, Jeffrey M.
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named LASER NEUROTHERAPY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |