USPTO serial 76340443
UNBREAKABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNBREAKABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Fields
SCOTT J FIELDS NATIONAL IP RIGHTS CENTER LLC550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | security devices, namely, computer security software for managing, monitoring and controlling data access in computers located in residential dwellings and commercial buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |