Drawing for POWERED PLUG INS

USPTO serial 76340532

POWERED PLUG INS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERED PLUG INS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFERSON F. SCHER

JEFFERSON F SCHER CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely, books, magazines, newsletters, technical reference manuals, and brochures in the field of hardware and software for use in audio media applications; printed matter, namely, instruction manuals in the field of computer hardware and software for use in audio media applicationsACTIVE—
042Design, development and programming of computer software for others; technical consultation related to computer hardware and software for use in audio media applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 16, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance