USPTO serial 76340710
ENCORE CREDIT CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENCORE CREDIT CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis J. Knobbe
CATHERINE J HOLLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Purchasing loans secured by one to four family residences; originating loans secured by one to four family residences; servicing loans secured by one to four family residences; selling loans secured by one to four family residences that have been purchased or originated by Applicant | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |