USPTO serial 76340849
HOME RESTAURANT COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME RESTAURANT COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Hughes
ROBERT B HUGHES MICHAEL F HUGHES HUGHES LAW FIRM, PLLCSTE 2014164 MERIDIAN STBELLINGHAM, WA 98226Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Non-electric kitchenware and cookware designed for home use, namely, mixing bowls, colanders, strainers, woks, stir fray pans, wok lids, egg poachers, omelet pans, turkey lifters, lasagna pans, stock pots, pot stands, cookie presses, spatulas, roasting pans, non-electric pressure cookers, serving spoons, and slotted spoons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |