Drawing for FRESCO FINISHES

USPTO serial 76341169

FRESCO FINISHES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2664833Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 17, 2002
Examiner
LAUTERBACH, JODI
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FRESCO FINISHES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS R. VIGIL

Thomas R. Vigil THOMAS R. VIGIL LAW OFFICES319 BLUFF COURTLAKE BARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037PLASTER CONTRACTING SERVICES FOR INSTALLING PLASTER AND/OR CEMENT, FRESCO-LIKE WALL FINISHESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 30, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2023CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 17, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2014NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Mar 22, 2013NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Jan 14, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 14, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 17, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 25, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 23, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 12, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance