USPTO serial 76341255
MEDIA MINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDIA MINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Michael Cleary
J MICHAEL CLEARY CLEARY & KOMEN, LLP600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SESTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs and software, namely computer programs and software for extracting information from video, audio, text and streaming media in real-time, for transforming audio data to text, for segmenting and processing incoming data streams by means of discriminating and quality criteria, for monitoring incoming data streams for information sought and for generating and updating databases by using such extracted information, as well as searching and retrieving data from databases by employing advanced information retrieval techniques and providing full text search criteria; speech recognition software | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages featuring the real-time analysis of video, audio, text and streaming signals during such transmission, and featuring the extraction of information from these signals during transmission; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer networks and computer terminals; providing telecommunications connections to data, database contents, documents, audio and video data files via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design and development of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |