Drawing for ADORABLE INTIMATES

USPTO serial 76341343

ADORABLE INTIMATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADORABLE INTIMATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D. ST. LANDAU

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100K STREET, WA 20005-1209

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Ladies' intimate apparel, namely, underwear, bras, camisoles, slips, sleepwear, loungewear and robesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 11, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance