Drawing for ALLIANT SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76341375

ALLIANT SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLIANT SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Garred

MARK B GARRED STETINA BRUNDA GARRED ET AL75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036providing on-line electronic payment services for fines and posting of bail amounts for legal infractions via a computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 26, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance