USPTO serial 76341432
RAPPIN ROOFUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with RAPPIN ROOFUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John N. Jennison
John N. Jennison Jennison & Shultz, P.C.2001 Jefferson Davis HighwaySuite 1102Arlington, VA 22202-3604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PLUSH TOYS AND DOLLS | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |