Drawing for THE FACE OF EPROCESS

USPTO serial 76341549

THE FACE OF EPROCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FACE OF EPROCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joanne Ludovici-Lint, Esq.

JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT ESQ MCDERMOTT WILL EMERY600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for creation, data entry, processing, storage, revision, identification, document conversion and completion of electronic forms; computer software used to read and interpret handwriting and signatures; computer software used to route and transmit electronic forms over computer networks; user manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—
042Providing technical consulting and information in the field of electronic forms, computers, computer networks, computer software, electronic form integration, and office automation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail, postings on global computer networks and in person; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; computer software development for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance