USPTO serial 76341631
GLENVIEW FARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLENVIEW FARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria C.H. Lin
MARIA C H LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN, LLP345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat and meat products, namely, bacon, hamburgers, roast beef, beef steak, meatballs, meatloaf, rissoles, cutlets; sausages, pork sausages and sausage products, namely, sausage patties, salami, pastrami, sausage for frying, liverwurst, pate, mortadella; poultry and poultry products, namely, frankfurter meats, chicken wings, chicken or turkey sticks, chicken nuggets, chicken or turkey cutlets, chicken game and game products, namely, meat patties and meat links, meat extracts, preserved meats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |