Drawing for Serial No. 76341667

USPTO serial 76341667

Serial No. 76341667

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3124992Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 1, 2006
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with Serial No. 76341667?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP2300 N Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Containers for video tapes, compact disks, DVDs, floppy disks, and memory chips, for use by others as packaging therefor, all sold emptySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 9, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 1, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
May 8, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 8, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 19, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 7, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2005AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Nov 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 16, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 10, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 12, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 8, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance