Drawing for ELIXIR

USPTO serial 76341706

ELIXIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2919343Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2005
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ELIXIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory K. Nelson

Gregory K. Nelson WEEKS NELSONPO Box 675963Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, ELECTRIC CIRCUITS; DISPLAYS, NAMELY, PLASMA DISPLAYS, CONSUMER ELECTRONICS DISPLAY; PHOTO MASKS, FOR ETCHING SILICON WAFERS; APPARATUS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND TESTS, NAMELY, APPARATUS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR ASSEMBLY, PROBING AND FINAL TESTS; SEMICONDUCTORS, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, NAMELY, MEMORY MODULE, DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY, STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY, NON-VOLATILE MEMORY, LOGIC DEVICES, EMBEDDED DEVICES, ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS FOR CONSUMER ELECTRONICS DISPLAYS AND ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS FOR PLASMA DISPLAYS; MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS, FLOATING POINT ARITHMETIC COMPUTER CHIPS, ULTRA LARGE SCALE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, NAMELY, MOTION PICTURE EXPERT GROUP (MPEG) CHIPS, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSOR CHIPS, COMPUTER PERIPHERAL CONTROL CHIPS, COMMUNICATION CONTROL CHIPS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR GAMES AND STAND-ALONE ELECTRONIC GAME COMPRISING ARITHMETIC CHIPS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, AND COMPRESSION OR DECOMPRESSION COMPUTER CHIPS; SILICON BARS, NAMELY, SILICON INGOTS FOR MAKING SILICON WAFERS, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY (LCD) DISPLAYSACTIVEFeb 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2025NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2025RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 3, 202589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 31, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 9, 2024E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 23, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 3, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 3, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 23, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 13, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 27, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 8, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 30, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 21, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 21, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Mar 24, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 20, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 7, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 19, 200344DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Nov 19, 20031.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Aug 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 3, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance