USPTO serial 76341740
SHOTFINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOTFINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Springfield, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph L. Johnson, Esq.
JOSEPH L JOHNSON ESQ LATHROP & GAGE L C1845 S NATIONAL AVESPRINGFIELD, MO 65808-4288UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accessories for hunters, namely electronic devices for detecting and signaling the presence of metal objects in the flesh of game animals | ACTIVE | May 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |