USPTO serial 76341806
ARBOR BVT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3220366Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2007
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARBOR BVT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia A. Smith
Claudia A. Smith Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE BRANDING, MARKETING AND ADVERTISING FIELDS; BRAND AND MARKET RESEARCH AND TESTING SERVICES; TRACKING AND MONITORING THE VITALITY AND STRENGTH OF TRADEMARKS AND BRANDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |