USPTO serial 76341878
CINCHONA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINCHONA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. Roxanne Edwards
S ROXANNE EDWARDS WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICKP O BOX 50784DALLAS, TX 75250-0784UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers and corers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coffee pots not made of precious metal, coffee services not made of precious metal, coffee servers not made of precious metal, coffee makers not made of precious metal, coffee percolators not made of precious metal, and reamers for fruit juice | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Sliced tropical fruits and vegetables, candied fruit, dried fruits, fruit preserves, fruit sauces, fruit toppings, fruit-based spreads, glazed fruits, pickled vegetables, dried vegetables, vegetable-based spreads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee additives, namely, sugar, cinnamon, honey, and caramels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Collin Street Bakery, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Collin Street Bakery, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CINCHONA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |