USPTO serial 76342005
HEMINGWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEMINGWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary B. Schmidt
GARY B SCHMIDT SWEENEY LEVSTE 2010708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4220Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-shave lotions, after-shave balms, body cream, body oil, body powder, cologne, skin conditioners, hair conditioners, shaving cream, shaving foam, deodorants, antiperspirants, eau de perfume, eau de toilette, facial creams, shaving gel, shower gel, bath gel, perfume, potpourri, room fragrances, scented body spray, hair shampoo, skin cleansers, skin moisturizer, skin soap, sun creams, sun screen preparations, sun tan lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |