Drawing for PRECISION CUTS

USPTO serial 76342048

PRECISION CUTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISION CUTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa M. Caldwell

LISA M CALDWELL KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLPONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 S W SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Barbershop and tanning salon servicesACTIVEDec 10, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 30, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 30, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 15, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 2, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 29, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance