USPTO serial 76342054
AUTOMATION WORKBENCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOMATION WORKBENCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ostfildern, DE
Ostfildern, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Langer
THOMAS LANGER COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 5TH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | industrial computers; programmable logic controllers and programmable safety controllers for industrial applications; electrical and/or electronic switching devices, namely safety relays, monitoring relays, and timer relays; electrical and/or electronic braking circuits for motors and engines; visualization equipment, namely text displays and graphic displays; operating terminals, touch-screen operating terminals; bus systems and components therefor, namely modules and circuits for establishing a digital data communication between a plurality of subscribers connected via a common communication link; cameras for image recording; image analyzing processors; software for the afore-mentioned apparatus, devices and equipment, namely software for configuring and operating industrial computers and programmable controllers, relays, displays, bus modules and bus circuits, cameras, and image processors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |