USPTO serial 76342055
SHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ostfildern, DE
Ostfildern, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Langer
THOMAS LANGER COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 5TH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | industrial computers; programmable logic controllers and programmable safety controllers for industrial applications; electrical and/or electronic switching devices, namely safety relays, monitoring relays, and timer relays; electrical and/or electronic braking circuits for motors and engines; visualization equipment, namely text displays and graphic displays; operating terminals, touch-screen operating terminals; bus systems and components therefor, namely modules and circuits for establishing a digital data communication between a plurality of subscribers connected via a common communication link; cameras for image recording; image analyzing processors; software for the afore-mentioned apparatus, devices and equipment, namely software for configuring and operating industrial computers and programmable controllers, relays, displays, bus modules and bus circuits, cameras, and image processors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |