USPTO serial 76342222
TEMPEST POWER UNIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEMPEST POWER UNIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sara Falkinham
SARA FALKINHAM ARMSTRONG ALLEN PLLCBRINKLEY PLZ80 MONROE AVE STE 700MEMPHIS, TN 38103-2481Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Apparatus for generating power for use in lighting, heating and other industrial uses, namely, a mobile source of electrical power for operating emergency lights, work lights, electric heaters, and electric power tools and a source for providing compressed air used to operate pneumatic hand tools and other types of pneumatic equipment, in commercial and industrial applications, such as factory, construction industry, and warehouse settings, including electric generators for generating power for use in lighting, heating and other industrial uses, namely, mobile electrical generators for operating emergency lights, work lights, electric heaters, and electric power tools; air compressors, namely, a source for providing compressed air used to operate pneumatic hand tools and other types of pneumatic equipment, in commercial and industrial applications, such as factory, construction industry, and warehouse settings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2003 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |