USPTO serial 76342234
NEW AIRPLANE-SAFE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2002
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEW AIRPLANE-SAFE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Toyko, JP
Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Toyko, JP
Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Toyko, JP
Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian H. Batzli
Brian H. Batzli MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Roller pen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI ENPITSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named NEW AIRPLANE-SAFE TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |