USPTO serial 76342381
ICAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto, JP
SHIMOGYO-KU, KYOTO, JP
SHIMOGYO-KU, KYOTO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diana Michelle Sobo
Diana Michelle Sobo WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLSuite 7001250 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical services, namely, gene diagnosis and gene therapy, marketed or directed to research laboratories of universities, pharmaceutical companies and doctors, and not including assessing the risk of getting cancer, devising courses of action to avoid cancer, diagnosing, treating and controlling infectious diseases, or selecting antibiotics; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods of others for the purpose of certification; chemical analysis of the goods of others; new product research and development services; laboratory research in the field of genetic engineering, not including assessing the risk of getting cancer or devising courses of action to avoid cancer; consulting, guidance or provision of information concerning genetic engineering, cell biology, protein engineering, glycobiology and other biotechnology, marketed or directed to research laboratories of universities, pharmaceutical companies and doctors, and not including consultation,guidance or information relating to assessing the risk of getting cancer, devising courses of action to avoid cancer, diagnosing, treating and controlling infectious diseases, or selecting antibiotics; consulting, guidance or provision of information concerning experimentation, analysis, research, examination, testing, detection, inspection, and certification of genes, marketed or directed to research laboratories of universities, pharmaceutical companies and doctors, and not including consultation, guidance or information relating to assessing the risk of getting cancer, devising courses of action to avoid cancer, diagnosing, treating and controlling infectious diseases, or selecting antibiotics; product safety testing, examination, and research concerning pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and food; medical services, namely, physical examination; dentistry; pharmaceutical drug development services; nutrition counseling; veterinary diagnosis; rental of ultrasonic diagnostic equipment; rental of physical or chemical laboratory apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by TAKARA HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TAKARA HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ICAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |