USPTO serial 76342588
AMCOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029633Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMCOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hawthorn, Victoria, AU
Abbotsford, AU
Abbotsford, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin P. Welch
Justin P. Welch Baker & McKenzie LLP2001 Ross Avenue2300 Trammell Crow CenterDallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | distributorship services in the field of paper and packaging supplies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |