Drawing for THE ZONE AT GLENDALE GALLERIA

USPTO serial 76342601

THE ZONE AT GLENDALE GALLERIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ZONE AT GLENDALE GALLERIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FLOYD A MANDELL

TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS525 W MONROE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60661-3693UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016(Based on Intent to Use) PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, POSTERS, STICKERS AND BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF FICTION, NON-FICTION BOOKS IN THE FIELDS OF BIOGRAPHIES, TRAVEL AND SELF-HELP, COUPON BOOKS AND BOOKS FEATURING PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISEMENTS OF OTHERSACTIVE—
025(Based on Use in Commerce) CLOTHING AND WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS AND SWEATSHIRTSACTIVEJul 14, 2000
035(Based on Use in Commerce) ADVERTISING AND BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATERIALS FOR OTHERS; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH A PREFERRED CUSTOMER PROMOTIONAL PROGRAM FEATURING FLYERS, COUPON BOOKS, FREQUENT SHOPPER CARDS, ADVERTISEMENTS, WEB SITES AND CONTESTS WHERE PARTICIPANTS ARE AWARDED PRIZES BY VARIOUS STORES IN THE SHOPPING CENTERACTIVEJul 14, 2000
036(Based on Use in Commerce) SHOPPING CENTER SERVICESACTIVEJul 14, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 21, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance