Drawing for ICE INTERNET .. COMMUNICATIONS .. ENGINE

USPTO serial 76342607

ICE INTERNET .. COMMUNICATIONS .. ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICE INTERNET .. COMMUNICATIONS .. ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly Moore Frankel

MOLLY MOORE FRANKEL HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR101 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely multi-purpose computer software program and tools to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of the multimedia software application, namely for the integration and standardization of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving picturesACTIVE—
035Advertising services, namely dissemination of advertising for others via the internet, and business services, namely business consultation and business development services in the nature of providing start-up support for businesses of othersACTIVE—
042Computer software programming for others, and application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the field of computer software to enhance to audio-visual capabilities of the multimedia applications of others, namely, for the integration and standardization of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving picturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 16, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance