USPTO serial 76342632
PRISM GT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRISM GT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Conexant Systems, Inc.
K10 - 171 CONEXANT SYSTEMS INC4000 MACARTHURNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SEMICONDUCTORS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, NAMELY, CIRCUITS CONTAINING TRANSISTORS OR OTHER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NAMELY, ELECTRICAL, INTEGRATED AND PRINTED CIRCUITS FOR COMPUTERS, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRONIC NETWORKS, DIGITAL AND ANALOG FUNCTIONS, MICROPROCESSORS, MICROCONTROLLERS, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS, PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CIRCUITS, POWER CONTROL CIRCUITS, AMPLIFIERS AND CONVERTERS ALL OF THE ABOVE FOR WIRED AND WIRELESS NETWORKS; WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (ICs); WIRELESS NETWORKING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (ICs); RADIO FREQUENCY INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (ICs); RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFACE CARDS, POWER AMPLIFIERS, RADIO FREQUENCY/INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY (RF/IF) CONVERTERS, INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY IF/BASEBAND CONVERTERS, UP CONVERTERS, DOWN CONVERTERS, INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY (IF) MODULATORS/DEMODULATORS, INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY (IF) QUADRATURE MODULATORS/DEMODULATORS; BASEBAND PROCESSORS (BBP); COMPUTER FIRMWARE TO RUN WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK (WLAN) PROTOCOLS ON THE WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK (WLAN) MEDIUM ACCESS CONTROLLER FOR WIRED AND WIRELESS NETWORKS; SOFTWARE DRIVERS, COMPILERS, ASSEMBLERS, DEBUGGERS, EVALUATION CIRCUIT BOARDS, EVALUATION KITS COMPRISED OF EVALUATION CIRCUIT BOARDS, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING THEREFOR, VOLTAGE CONTROLLED OSCILLATORS (VCO), COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY BASEBAND PROCESSORS (BBP), NETWORK INTERFACE PROCESSORS, ACCESS POINTS, GATEWAYS, STATION CARDS, CLIENT CARDS, NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS, PCMCIA CARDS, WIRELESS NETWORKING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND OPERATING SOFTWARE, NAMELY WIRED AND WIRELESS NETWORK BASE STATIONS, REMOTE STATIONS, RELAY STATIONS, GATEWAYS, AND COMPUTERS; ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT BOARDS AND MODULES CONTAINING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND POWER DEVICES FOR WIRED AND WIRELESS NETWORKS; CIRCUIT BOARDS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, RADIO, TELEVISION AND TELEPHONE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION; DEVICE DRIVERS FOR OPERATING THE ABOVE GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intersil Americas Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intersil Americas Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CONEXANT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PRISM GT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |