USPTO serial 76342739
DENIM PINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DENIM PINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quesnel, CA
QUESNEL, BRITISH COLUMBIA V1W 6W1, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Raw, remanufactured, finger jointed, outdoor, edge glued, ready to assemble, turned, pressure-treated and dimensional wood products, namely, lumber, lumber in the form of cants, squares, blanks, blocks, paneling; plywood, wood veneers, laminate wooden flooring; wood composites in the nature of wood beams, wood joints, wood joists, wood moldings, wood paneling and wood posts; wooden construction elements, namely, stairs, stair treads, stair risers, railings for use in fences and banisters, building materials, namely, decking; finished and unfinished window and door frames, exterior and interior doors and garage doors, fencing and fence panels, siding, shingles, stakes; prefabricated wooden buildings and structures, and log homes; building materials, structural products and engineered wood products, namely, roof and floor trusses, glulam beams, I-beams, paralam beams, joists; pre-cut garden sheds and millwork exclusive of cabinets | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Wood packaging in the nature of skid pallets, pallets, bins, box stock, namely, wooden boxes made from stock lumber; crates; pre-cut, pre-assembled and ready-to-assemble furniture; cabinets, furniture; wooden boxes; storage racks and wall-mounted gun racks; caskets; wooden garden stakes and ten stakes, wooden sculptures and carvings | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Undressed timber and unsawn timber | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PONT, LYNN
- Other trademarks owned by 632068 B.C. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named DENIM PINE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |