USPTO serial 76342816
BEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3021323Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M. DALY
SUSAN M DALY GREENBERG TRAURIG2375 E CAMELBACK RDSTE 700PHOENIX, AZ 85016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF AUTOMATED TAX PREPARATION AND ELECTRONIC FILING OF TAX RETURNS; ELECTRONIC TAX FILING SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELDS OF ACCOUNTING, TAX TREATMENT, TAX PREPARATION AND FILING, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, HUMAN RESOURCES AND SOFTWARE PRODUCT MARKETING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF AUTOMATED TAX PREPARATION AND FILING, FILING OF FINANCIAL AND REGULATORY REPORTS, AND THE USE OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF ACCOUNTING, HUMAN RESOURCES, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Best Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Best Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Best Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |