Drawing for RED DIAMOND CAPP-O-CHILLO

USPTO serial 76343048

RED DIAMOND CAPP-O-CHILLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED DIAMOND CAPP-O-CHILLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIMBERLY TILL POWELL

KIMBERLY TILL POWELL BALCH & BINGHAM LLP1710 SIXTH AVE NBIRMINGHAM, AL 35203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Iced coffee and cappuccinoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance