Drawing for FINNING

USPTO serial 76343089

FINNING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINNING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George C. Rondeau, Jr

GEORGE C RONDEAU JR DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTSTE 2600, 1501 FOURTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-1688

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007pipe layers, electrical generating sets, compressed air equipment, cranes, excavators, and parts therefor, conveyors; air-driven tools; backhoe loaders; paving equipment, namely, soil compactors, asphalt compactors, pavement profilers, and asphalt distributors; compactors; wheel dozers; mechanized tree harvesters; mechanized tree processors; and parts, attachments, and accessories, namely, screed extensionsACTIVE—
012new and used equipment, namely, tractors, motor graders, loaders, tractor-scrapers, off-highway trucks, fork lift trucks, straddle carriers, log skidders, and parts therefor; articulated dump trucks; hand trucks; and cartsACTIVE—
037repairing, maintaining, and servicing engines, tractors, motor graders, loaders, tractor-scrapers, off-highway trucks, fork lift trucks, straddle carriers, log skidders, pipe layers, electrical generating sets, compressed air equipment, cranes, excavators, and parts therefor, designing, laying out, and supervising and installation of shelving and storage facilities; repairing, maintaining, and servicing air-driven tools, backhoe loaders, articulated dump trucks, paving equipment, compactors, wheel dozers, mechanized tree harvesters, mechanized tree processors, and parts, attachments, and accessories thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 30, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance