Drawing for LUNAR ROCKET

USPTO serial 76343154

LUNAR ROCKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUNAR ROCKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Evan M. Kent

EVAN M KENT RUSS, AUGUST, KABAT & KENT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028TOYS, NAMELY, FLYING WINGED TUBES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFORACTIVENov 7, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 7, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 4, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance