Drawing for SINCLAIR SMARTROLL

USPTO serial 76343213

SINCLAIR SMARTROLL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINCLAIR SMARTROLL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL F KRIEGER

MICHAEL F KRIEGER KIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINERY FOR APPLYING LABELS TO ARTICLES, FOR HANDLING REELS OF LABELS, FOR PRINTING, CUTTING AND FORMING LABELS, FOR PACKING OR PACKAGING; MACHINERY FOR APPLYING SELF-ADHESIVE LABELS TO FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, FOR READING ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION PRESENT ON LABELS AND FOR PROCESSING THAT INFORMATION, PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODSACTIVE—
016PRINTED LABELS AND SELF-ADHESIVE LABELS NOT OF TEXTILES FOR APPLICATION TO FRUIT AND VEGETABLES, PRINTED PACKING INSERTS FOR USE IN PACKING OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, AND ROLLS OF ADHESIVE LABELS FOR USE IN AUTOMATIC LABELING MACHINESACTIVE—
039RENTAL OF PACKAGING AND LABELING MACHINERY FOR PACKING, PACKAGING AND LABELING OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES AND OTHER GOODSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 31, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance