Drawing for CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 76343278

CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3089022Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 9, 2006
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Camille M. Miller

CAMILLE M MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009voice and data communications devices, namely, modems, telephones, IP-enabled household appliances, namely, personal computers, Internet bridges, routers, repeaters, IP-enabled electric meters, medium voltage couplers, power line servers; telecommunications software, namely, driver software for the modems; communications software for transmitting information via power lines, radio frequencies, fiber, and copper, and for providing access to power line serversSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 30, 2001
038Electronic communications network services, namely, transmission of audio and video via electronic communications networks, automatic meter reading, real-time fault detection and isolation, power quality monitoring, distribution automation, demand-side management, remote connect/disconnectSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 27, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 9, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 23, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance