Drawing for DREAM

USPTO serial 76343337

DREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029applesauce, bacon, baked beans, bean dip, beef, beef patties, beef stew, beef stock, blood sausage, bologna, bouillon, soup broth, butter, butter substitutes, canned pork and beans, canned, cooked or otherwise processed tomatoes, cheese, chicken, chicken stock, chili with beans, chili without beans, chocolate milk, cole slaw, cooking oil, cream cheese, canned vegetables, eggs, fish, french fried potatoes, hominy, hot dogs, instant potatoes, luncheon meats, margarine, margarine substitutes, milk, shelled, roasted, or otherwise processed nuts, olive oil, peanut butter, pickles, pork, potato chips, raisins, refried beans, salad oil, roast beef, seafood, snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts, and/or raisins, soup mixes, soups, tuna fish, turkey, uncooked hamburger patties, yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 24, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 16, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance