USPTO serial 76343399
MWH ENTERPRISES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MWH ENTERPRISES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Hoffman
DAVID L HOFFMAN LAW OFFICES OF DAVID L. HOFFMAN27023 MCBEAN PKWY STE 422VALENCIA, CA 91355UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, consulting services, project and construction financing services; obtaining risk insurance, namely, insurance consultation regarding risk insurance and assistance in obtaining risk insurance, furnishing and processing loan documentation, namely, providing loan financing information and loan financing, preparing grant proposals and preparing and conducting feasibility studies, namely, preparing business reports, business research and surveys and providing business information in the field of grant proposals and feasibility studies, providing information in the field of grants, providing information in the field of financing and financing services through national and international banking; privatization services, namely, hydroelectric factory construction and consultation; construction supervision; commercial building construction; engineering services, engineering and construction planning studies and consulting services for, namely, due diligence, river basin planning, generation expansion planning, dispatch models, financial analysis, marginal cost studies, pumped storage, hydroelectric, condition assessment, operation audits, risk analysis and assessment, economic and financial analysis, and portfolio review; preparing business research and surveys and providing business information in the nature of facilitating due diligence, river basin planning, generation expansion planning and environmental dispatch models; economic forecasting and analysis; financial analysis and consultation; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental laws and regulations in the nature of facilitating due diligence, river basin planning, generation expansion planning and environmental dispatch models | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |