USPTO serial 76343416
VOICE SECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOICE SECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRETCHEN R. STROUD
GRETCHEN R STROUD COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE NAMELY AN APPLICATION TO IMPROVE SECURITY FOR BOTH INTERNET AND TELEPHONE BASED SYSTEMS THROUGH VOICEPRINT AUTHENTICATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |