USPTO serial 76343501
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH
63263 Neu-Isenburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH
Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH
63263 Neu-Isenburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH
Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH
Neu-Isenburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH
NEU-ISENBURG, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah L. Corpus
Deborah L. Corpus Chrisman Gallo Tochtrop LLC6509 Brecksville Road #31550Independence, OH 44131United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs recorded on data carriers for processing of invoices and payment transactions and for planning of trips and the processing of traveling expenses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultancy; business organization consultancy in the fields of special event planning, product development, product development consultation, and product research and development services; business management consultancy; marketing, namely, performing advertising and publicity activities for third parties, advertising by mail order; conducting of general events and customer relationship events for third parties, namely, product demonstrations, cooperative advertising and marketing, direct marketing advertising for others, conducting marketing studies, business marketing consulting services, and providing business marketing information; accounting services for third parties, namely, travel cost accounting; data processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing financial services, namely, issuance of credit and service cards, credit card services; providing financial advice; processing of invoices and attending to payment transactions, namely, card-based accounting of services by third parties including compilation and evaluation of credit data relating to such services; conducting organizational technical processes for third parties in the field of finance, namely, banking and clearing activities generally conducted by and for credit card companies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | News reporting services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |